Election petition tribunal: Counsels argue over Kwara governor-elect’s certificate

election

Counsels to Kwara state governor-elect and the PDP governorship candidate in the 2019 general elections continued their argument over the authenticity of the WAEC certificate presented to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) by the governor-elect for the election.

At the continuation of pre-hearing trial of the election petition tribunal in Ilorin on Thursday, Salman Jawondo, counsel to the second respondent, who is the governor-elect, Alhaji Abdulrahman Abdulrazaq, had tendered photocopy of WAEC certificate of another person to the tribunal to show that names or initials of candidates can be abbreviated.

However, counsel to the PDP governorship candidate and the PDP in the state, Kingsley Odeh, argued that West African Examination Council (WAEC) does not abbreviate surname, even if it were to abbreviate first names.

Odeh, who identified “conflict” in the documents tendered by Jawondo, said that the governor-elect submitted a WAEC certificate with Razaq A.P in 2019 general elections and a document which reads Razaq A.R. in 2014 general elections.

“That’s the conflict”, he said, adding that the photocopy of WAEC certificate tendered by Jawondo was General Education certificate of WAEC and not that of the Senior Secondary School Examination certificate of WAEC.

Speaking with journalists after the tribunal sitting on Thursday, counsel to the INEC, Rowland Otaru SAN, said that petitioner got it wrong to put initials of the governor-elect as A.P.

ALSO READ: BREAKING: Senate confirms Emefiele’s reappointment as CBN Governor

“What the petitioners were saying in their pleadings is that Abdulrazaq A.P., but initials of the governor-elect is not even A.P. It is A.R. So, even from the body of their petition, they are even wrong. We now want to show that the certificate of the governor-elect is genuine, valid and issued by WAEC. With due respect, they are just playing to the gallery. The photocopy brought was to show the court that it’s not wrong for names of candidates to have initials. The court then asked for the original of the certificate to be brought in order to compare it with the photocopy tendered. And so be it”, he said.

Otaru, who said that he did not give consent to declaration of results documents presented by the petitioner on Thursday, said that the onus was on them to prove. “In the fullness of time, we are going to canvass very strong argument in respect of documents which they seemed to tender”, he said.

However, counsel to the PDP governorship candidate and the PDP in the state, Kingsley Odeh, said that it was actually the governor-elect’s counsel that tendered bundle of evidence containing second respondent’s certificate that was submitted alongside other documents.

“The photocopy of certificate actually submitted for 2019 elections reads Razaq AP. Now, in their response, they have annexed another document, a certificate he actually submitted in 2014 general elections. That document reads Razaq A.R. So, they’ve actually aided our case. They’ve made everything simple. It shows clearly that in 2019 they submitted a document with Razaq A.P. and in 2014 they submitted a document which reads Razaq A.R. That’s the conflict.

“For the purpose of clarity, WAEC does not abbreviate surname, even if it were to abbreviate first names. Razaq A.P. and Razaq A.R. can mean that any other person can claim the abbreviation. In his age declaration that was attached to the documents like INEC voters card, testimonial from secondary school in Kaduna, all those documents bear his full names, Abdulrahman Abdulrazaq. There was nowhere his name was abbreviated.

“On pleadings by INEC, which is a custodian of the documents that were pleaded, the counsel does not even have them in court. The INEC counsel was also objecting to his documents tendered by the petitioner, which is a declaration of result. He refused to give his consent to the documents. What they are hiding would be revealed during trial, to show that the petitioner had made out case for themselves. You cannot tender two contradictory documents. That’s why in our second ground of petition we are saying that the second respondent gave false information containing his affidavit submitted to INEC in aid of his educational qualification”, he said.

However, the tribunal has fixed Wednesday, May 22, 2019 for the continuation of pre-hearing trial as well as enable INEC to produce documents in its custody.

The post Election petition tribunal: Counsels argue over Kwara governor-elect’s certificate appeared first on Tribune Online.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: